Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm glad about that. I find it weird reading through comment threads or forums and seeing mobile phone emojis scattered through. I find them distracting.

I'm not really too sure why. I don't mind them in personal messages or texts and stuff, but seeing them on public pages just kind of annoys me for some reason.



> I'm glad about that.

I'm not because it's completely arbitrary about it e.g. you can include 🁓, 🀕, ⏱, 🃅, box drawing, or Z̸̠̽a̷͍̟̱͔͛͘̚ĺ̸͎̌̄̌g̷͓͈̗̓͌̏̉o̴̢̺̹̕ but not trigrams, die faces, box elements, musical notes or flags. They just whitelisted/blacklisted entire blocks and called it a day.

Which obviously is par for the course when it comes to HN's comment box, the markup system is even more half-assed.


Sounds like they blacklisted things likely to clutter up the comment threads and left things unlikely to be used.

Country flags seem like they could be used for political trolling.

Die faces could lead to weird rolling threads or other things.

Musical notes, you got me, can't really think of anything too bad for those.

The markup's not great, but too much formatting is distracting. I personally prefer the limited options. You focus more on the content of your comment than making it look pretty.

The only thing i really despise about hn's formatting is the code blocks or whatever they are, the one on mobile that vanishes off the side and you have to scroll horizontally to read everything. I really can't stand when people use those for quotes.

Other than that though, hn's formatting makes everything uniform and fairly easy to read through. There's no fancy nonsense getting in the way of things.

Actually, that's part of why those code block things piss me off, they're probably the fanciest piece of formatting you can do and all it does is obstruct information and make me waste time while reading.


> Sounds like they blacklisted things likely to clutter up the comment threads and left things unlikely to be used.

That’s not really believable given how arbitrary it is.

> Die faces could lead to weird rolling threads or other things.

As if tiles or playing cards could not be used that way.

> The markup's not great, but too much formatting is distracting.

The problem is that despite having only two directives half of HN’s markup is actively detrimental: because there is no escaping, no inline literals, and the parsing is sub-par, in my experience the “emphasis” directive causes issues more often than it helps. HN’s markup would be significantly improved by removing it entirely.

> I really can't stand when people use those for quotes

Which would be way less likely if HN actually supported quotes.


>> I really can't stand when people use those for quotes

>Which would be way less likely if HN actually supported quotes.

But look how well this works ;p.

Sorry...couldn't resist.

I dunno, I like the 'hackish' nature of it.

You're right i'm sure the tiles or playing cards could be used like that too, it may be arbitrary, I don't know. But, those were just some reasons off the top of my head, i'm sure when HN was being programmed a bit more thought went into it, or maybe not, who knows?

My main point is, I like the simplicity of it all, sure it could be better, but better doesn't necessarily lead to better quality content.

There's a minimum amount of distractions, most users find reasonable ways to communicate the context of the content of their posts and scrolling through most threads tends to be a mostly uniform experience where if users are following a few established conventions, you can follow the flow of things pretty well.

It's not perfect, it's not the best, but I feel like it fits the general vibe and nature of the site. It gives HN an identity among all the other news aggregators and forums.


> That’s not really believable given how arbitrary it is.

No, that's exactly what they did. I asked.


I don't think that die faces are emojis. They range from U+2680 to U+2685.

Let's see if they work here:

Edit: No, they were filtered out.


I wish they would add U+2009 (thin space) to that list. That's the standard way under the SI system to separate digit groups, e.g., 1 234 567. HN just treats it as a regular space.

(The SI standard for separating the integer part from the fractional part is to use "." or ",", whichever is customary in your location. Using thin space for grouping removes the ambiguity that you get in places that use one of "."/"," for grouping and the other for a decimal point).


I wonder if that's putting things through unicode "canonical normalization", or than custom rules.

Let's see what it does with `U+00BC Vulgar Fraction One Quarter Unicode Character`... ¼

Nope it allows it instead of turning into `1/4`, so that's not canonical normalization. I guess it's custom rules? Or some other unicode transformation we're not thinking of, or other third-party re-usable transformation.


> I guess it's custom rules? Or some other unicode transformation we're not thinking of, or other third-party re-usable transformation.

They just blacklisted (or whitelisted) blocks or categories.


Converting a U+2009 THIN SPACE into an ordinary ascii space is not black/whitelisting.


True, there's almost certainly a whitespace normalisation pass at one point as well, likely during / around the processing of what little makup HN has.


Imagine how much more expressive my comment would've been if HN didn't strip the emoji [1] I had at the end though

[1] https://emojipedia.org/pensive-face/


It would make me instantly disregard your comment as immature


hm that feels more like a problem you have than one inherent to my comment tho


how about very carefully rebased commit histories?


Oddly enough nobody in my company uses emoji in commit messages, even though we have no policy that prevents it. It just doesn't make sense there.

I see it on public repositories sometimes, but it never really seems to add anything useful.


The amp project uses them a lot, and has a system where different kinds of commits get different leading emoji: https://github.com/ampproject/amphtml/commits/master

I'm used to them at this point, and it's kind of nice when scanning commits to be able to see what type they are.


I have to admit, i've never actually read through any commit histories with emojis in them...

Don't get me wrong, i'm not going to get mad or lose my mind or anything when I see an emoji somewhere, it just I dunno it looks wrong or something.


Switch your system / default font to B&W if you don't like the colorised emoji.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: